Best multilingual AI meeting assistant

Ranked products

1. Grain

   Grain ranks 1st because:

   • Grain has transcription languages: 130; higher values score more (12/12 points).
   • Grain supports zoom.
   • Grain supports Google Meet.
   • Grain supports Microsoft Teams.
   • Grain supports bot-based recording.

   Score: 27/27 · verified criteria: 5/5

2. Fireflies.ai

   Fireflies.ai shares 2nd place because:

   • Fireflies.ai has transcription languages: 100; higher values score more (8.84/12 points).
   • Fireflies.ai supports zoom.
   • Fireflies.ai supports Google Meet.
   • Fireflies.ai supports Microsoft Teams.
   • Fireflies.ai supports bot-based recording.

   Score: 23.84/27 · verified criteria: 5/5

3. MeetGeek

   MeetGeek shares 2nd place because:

   • MeetGeek has transcription languages: 100; higher values score more (8.84/12 points).
   • MeetGeek supports zoom.
   • MeetGeek supports Google Meet.
   • MeetGeek supports Microsoft Teams.
   • MeetGeek supports bot-based recording.

   Score: 23.84/27 · verified criteria: 5/5

4. Speak AI

   Speak AI shares 2nd place because:

   • Speak AI has transcription languages: 100; higher values score more (8.84/12 points).
   • Speak AI supports zoom.
   • Speak AI supports Google Meet.
   • Speak AI supports Microsoft Teams.
   • Speak AI supports bot-based recording.

   Score: 23.84/27 · verified criteria: 5/5

5. Fellow

   Fellow ranks 5th because:

   • Fellow has transcription languages: 99; higher values score more (8.74/12 points).
   • Fellow supports zoom.
   • Fellow supports Google Meet.
   • Fellow supports Microsoft Teams.
   • Fellow supports bot-based recording.

   Score: 23.74/27 · verified criteria: 5/5

6. Avoma

   Avoma ranks 6th because:

   • Avoma has transcription languages: 75; higher values score more (6.21/12 points).
   • Avoma supports zoom.
   • Avoma supports Google Meet.
   • Avoma supports Microsoft Teams.
   • Avoma supports bot-based recording.

   Score: 21.21/27 · verified criteria: 5/5

7. Notta

   Notta ranks 7th because:

   • Notta has transcription languages: 58; higher values score more (4.42/12 points).
   • Notta supports zoom.
   • Notta supports Google Meet.
   • Notta supports Microsoft Teams.
   • Notta supports bot-based recording.

   Score: 19.42/27 · verified criteria: 5/5

8. Sembly AI

   Sembly AI ranks 8th because:

   • Sembly AI has transcription languages: 48; higher values score more (3.37/12 points).
   • Sembly AI supports zoom.
   • Sembly AI supports Google Meet.
   • Sembly AI supports Microsoft Teams.
   • Sembly AI supports bot-based recording.

   Score: 18.37/27 · verified criteria: 5/5

9. Tactiq

   Tactiq ranks 9th because:

   • Tactiq has transcription languages: 60; higher values score more (4.63/12 points).
   • Tactiq supports zoom.
   • Tactiq supports Google Meet.
   • Tactiq supports Microsoft Teams.

   Score: 16.63/27 · verified criteria: 5/5

10. Fathom

    Fathom shares 10th place because:

    • Fathom supports zoom.
    • Fathom supports Google Meet.
    • Fathom supports Microsoft Teams.
    • Fathom supports bot-based recording.

    Score: 15/27 · verified criteria: 4/5

11. Krisp

    Krisp shares 10th place because:

    • Krisp has transcription languages: 16; higher values score more (0/12 points).
    • Krisp supports zoom.
    • Krisp supports Google Meet.
    • Krisp supports Microsoft Teams.
    • Krisp supports bot-based recording.

    Score: 15/27 · verified criteria: 5/5

12. tl;dv

    tl;dv ranks 12th because:

    • tl;dv has transcription languages: 30; higher values score more (1.47/12 points).
    • tl;dv supports zoom.
    • tl;dv supports Google Meet.
    • tl;dv supports Microsoft Teams.

    Score: 13.47/27 · verified criteria: 4/5

Criteria comparison

Products are ranked only from verified, sourced facts. Missing evidence remains unknown and does not count as a negative claim.

Method and alternate format

Only products meeting the evidence threshold and coverage-gap rule are ranked. Missing facts earn no points and are not treated as negative claims.

Read the methodology · Read the Markdown version